Search Here

Custom Search

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Starting in pakistan



Class of locomotiveALU 20(Co-Co)
Locomotive ModelDL-543
Locomotive in number52
Locomotive Grouping4401 to 4452
Manufacturer of LocomotiveALCO Products Inc. USA.
Date of 1st Locomotive put in ServiceJune 30, 1962
Length of Locomotive54ft
Number of Wheels
12
Number of Traction Motors6
Authorized speed of the Locomotive (Km/h)120
Weight of Locomotive in working order (t)102
Axle load17
Model of diesel engineALCO 251-C
Diesel Engine manufacturerALCO Products Inc. USA.
Diesel Engine Horsepower2000
Fuel Capacity6100 Imp. gallons
Max. Tractive Effort66822 lbs.

News;


10 February 2006 : A Chinese container train carrying chemicals collided with a stationary oil train in southern Pakistan on Friday, sparking a fire but causing no casualties, officials said. The accident happened at Ungar railway station around 180 kilometers (110 miles) north of Karachi.
The train carrying oil was on the track at the station when a northbound goods train hit it from behind and a fire broke out. 18 wagons of the goods train were burnt out in the blaze, and some oil was spilled at the scene.
The locomotive No.8201(HGMU30) hauling the chemicals special was completely gutted. According to a Pakistan Railways technical staff, the oil special was detained on the block section due to a brake fault while the chemicals special lost its vacuum on the steep down grade. Pakistan Railways' vacuum brake system is in total disarray and spares not readily available.
Cynics are of the view that the collision took place on a straight stretch of 10 kms and sufficient distance for the crew of the U/C to apply manual emergency braking.

PAKISTAN RAILWAYS TRAIN CRASHES



4 July 2005 (0345 Hrs): 24 Dn Quetta Express which was to run through Sarhad was detained on the main line due to a fault on the train brake system. The starter and advance starter were set to green while the 24 Dn train crew were working under the affected coach. In the meanwhile,16 Dn Karachi Express was given a paper line clear at Mirpur Mathelo to proceed to Sarhad .
The 24 Dn was leading the 16 Dn by half an hour. With this thing in mind the crew of 16 Dn misjudged the GREEN starter signals as CLEAR and the RED outer and home as faulty .(A report regarding the faulty signaling system at Sarhad was lodged about 45 days ago). The 24 Dn had an oil lit tail lamp which has a visual range of about 200 meters. Now as the 16 Dn approached the OUTER the red tail lamp of the 16 Dn brake van loomed into view. The 16 Dn crew applied EMERGENCY BRAKE but the distance was insufficient because of a low braking power.
Two coaches of the 16 Dn which had dragging brakes were isolated from the rake's braking system which was not reported to the driver of the 16 Dn. So he was unaware of the depleted braking power of his 16 Dn . Nevertheless , his reflex action did save lives on the16 Dn. The 16 Dn ploughed into the detained 24 Dn because of the fact that the turnout was not set for the loop line While the domino effect was in progress the 7 Up Tezgam was flying through the Up main line. Only the locomotive and three coaches had crossed when the catapulted coaches of the 24 Dn started nudging the rake of the 7 Up.

map of the network in pakistan


map of the network in pakistan;

the map wil show the network of the trains path and the stations and information about the way of the trains executing in pakistan.

History of pakistan Railways


Pakistan Railways provides an important mode of Transportation in the farthest corners of the country and brings them closer for Business, sight seeing, pilgrimage and education. It has been a great integrating force and forms the life line of the country by catering to its needs for large scale movement of people and freight.The possibility of Karachi as a sea port was first noticed in the mid of 19th century and Sir Henry Edward Frere who was appointed Commissioner of Sind after its annexation with Bombay in 1847 sought permission from Lord Dalhousie to begin survey of sea port. He also initiated the survey for Railway line in 1858 . It was proposed that a railway line from Karachi City to Kotri, steam navigation up the Indus /Chenab upto Multan and from there an other railway to Lahore and beyond be constructed.It was on 13th May,1861 that first railway line was opened for public traffic between Karachi City and Kotri, the distance of 105 miles. The line between Karachi City and Keamari was opened on 16.6.1889.By 1897 the line from Keamari to Kotri was doubled.The railway line from Peshawar to Karachi closely follows Alexander’s line of march through the Hindu Kush to the sea. Different sections on existing main line from Peshawar to Lahore and Multan and branch lines were constructed in the last quarter of 19th century and early years of 20th century.The 4 sections i.e.Scinde railways, Indian Flotilla company Punjab railway and Delhi railways working in a single company were later on amalgamated into Scinde, Punjab & Delhi railways company and was purchased by the Secretary of State for India in 1885 and in January, 1886 it was named North Western State Railways which was later on renamed as North Western Railways.At the time of partition, North Western Railway’s 1847 route mile was transferred to India leaving route miles 5048 to Pakistan. In 1954 The railway line was extended to Mardan and Charsada section and in 1956 Jacababad-Kashmore 2’-6’’ line was converted into broad gauge. Kot Adu-Kashmore line was constructed between 1969 to 1973 providing an alternate route from Karachi to up country.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Voestalpine Buys US Railway Track Systems Maker


Austrian steelmaker Voestalpine said on Friday it had acquired a US supplier of speciality components for railway tracks, part of a plan by the company to expand its railway division.

Voestalpine said its North American unit, VAE Nortrak, which makes railway switches and other track materials, had acquired the assets of Leading Edge Enterprises of Decatur, Illinois.

The company declined to name a figure for the acquisition but said it was 'relatively small'.

"This is a small part of our railway division expansion," said a company spokesman.

Voestalpine in February gave a grim outlook for the steel industry and forecast a drop in full-year operating profit, noting that the only sectors in which demand had held up in well in the third quarter were the energy industry and railway infrastructure.

‘Give money to rail apprentices, not training companies’ — Pete Waterman


PETE Waterman — pop music impresario and railway entrepreneur — has made an impassioned plea for the Government to make money available directly to apprentices rather than to ‘a myriad’ of training companies.

Speaking at a Railnews seminar at the Railtex exhibition at Earls Court 2 in London, he said it cost £45,000 a year to employ and train apprentices — who are desperately needed for the future rail industry to replace an ageing workforce and keep work in Britain.

Pete Waterman, who runs a rail engineering company in Crewe — and has proposed it as the basis for a National Railway Skills Academy — complained that training providers received £7,000 for one-day-a-week courses, and colleges got another £7,000 for the day-release courses.

But he said employers got nothing and had to pay apprentices for the other four days of each week — plus additional costs, such as tax and national insurance, costing a total of £45,000 per apprentice per year.

With the exception of Network Rail— with what Pete Waterman called its “utterly brilliant” apprentice training scheme at Gosport, Hants, costing around £1.5 million a year — he said few railway industry companies can afford to employ apprentices.

In the past year, excluding Network Rail, only 38 apprentices had been taken on across the entire rail industry — but there were 729 companies being paid by the Government to carry out apprentice training, he said.

Pete Waterman commented that the Government was spending £3.5 billion a year through the Learning and Skills Council, adding: “This money should not go to the myriad of companies set up to do the training. It should go to the people who deserve it — the apprentices.”

He also criticised the Government for expecting parents of youngsters under 18 to pay for their children’s training.

Pete Waterman disclosed he had spent £900,000 of his own money on training apprentices at his railway engineering business at Crewe. He said he was now prepared to take on another 20 apprentices — but only if the Government agreed to pay employers instead of universities and colleges.

He was concerned that without adequate training programmes for the rail industry, work would go increasingly to overseas companies.

And he said he had been shocked to see how many foreign firms were exhibiting at Railtex

“We are in danger of giving our rail industry away — and if we don’t train people to take on the future challenges we will have nothing to do in this country,” said Pete Waterman. “ We are now having trains made abroad to fit our loading gauge in this country and then ship them here so we just have to fit the batteries.”

He said a Railway Skills Academy was needed to replace what over 700 training companies do now.

The Academy should not be located in one place — although the HQ might be in Crewe — but where the skills were needed. “Training in Crewe for NVQs for Crossrail would be pointless,” he explained.

“But we do need a national goal and we do need to think country-wide,” Pete Waterman added.